Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY-NC-ND)es
dc.contributor.authorBiesenbendera, Sophiees
dc.contributor.authorPetersohna, Sabrinaes
dc.contributor.authorThiedig, Christophes
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-19T19:30:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-19T19:30:20Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace-ti.anii.org.uy/jspui/handle/123456789/333-
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the factors that contribute or hinder the (joint) adoption of current research information systems (CRIS) and Open Access repositories (OAR) as manifestations of the Open Science principle. Given the significance attached to Open Open Access repositories (OAR) as manifestations of the Open Science principle. Given the significance attached to Open Science principles such as transparency and accessibility, we ask whether CRIS are able to reflect these priorities by providing Science principles such as transparency and accessibility, we ask whether CRIS are able to reflect these priorities by providing technical interfaces or integrating OAR into the CRIS structure. We suggest that the interplay of national and institutional technical interfaces or integrating OAR into the CRIS structure. We suggest that the interplay of national and institutional governance structures and policies is crucial for the adequate and efficient integration of CRIS and Open Science. To account for governance structures and policies is crucial for the adequate and efficient integration of CRIS and Open Science. To account for variances in both national and institutional context factors, we compare research institutions in three countries: Italy, the variances in both national and institutional context factors, we compare research institutions in three countries: Italy, the Netherlands and Germany. The qualitative exploratory analysis suggests that the consistent adoption and implementation of Netherlands and Germany. The qualitative exploratory analysis suggests that the consistent adoption and implementation of CRIS and Open Access policies in a science system are facilitated by national evaluation or quality assessment policies. In CRIS and Open Access policies in a science system are facilitated by national evaluation or quality assessment policies. In addition, the integration of Open Access repositories into CRIS is furthered by an institutionalized, efficient and flexible CRIS addition, the integration of Open Access repositories into CRIS is furthered by an institutionalized, efficient and flexible CRIS infrastructure.es
dc.description.sponsorshipAgencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovaciónes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.rightsAcceso abiertoes
dc.sourceProcedia Computer Sciencees
dc.subjectCurrent research information systemses
dc.subjectInstitutional repositorieses
dc.subjectOpen accesses
dc.subjectOpen sciencees
dc.subjectResearch information managementes
dc.titleUsing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Sciencees
dc.typeArtículoes
dc.subject.aniiCiencias Sociales
dc.subject.aniiComunicación y Medios
dc.subject.aniiCiencias de la Información
dc.identifier.aniiFCE_1_2017_1_135352es
dc.type.versionPublicadoes
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.089-
dc.anii.subjectcompleto//Ciencias Sociales/Comunicación y Medios/Ciencias de la Informaciónes
Aparece en las colecciones: Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable

Archivos en este ítem:
archivo  Descripción Tamaño Formato
1_s20_S1877050919300948_main.pdfDescargar 720.47 kBAdobe PDF

Las obras en REDI están protegidas por licencias Creative Commons.
Por más información sobre los términos de esta publicación, visita: Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY-NC-ND)