Título : | Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase Using Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to showcase national and institutional research (potential): research information national and institutional research (potential): research information systems in the context of Open Science |
Autor(es) : | Biesenbendera, Sophie Petersohna, Sabrina Thiedig, Christoph |
Fecha de publicación : | 2019 |
Tipo de publicación: | Artículo |
Versión: | Publicado |
Publicado por: | Elsevier |
Publicado en: | Procedia Computer Science |
Areas del conocimiento : | Ciencias Sociales Comunicación y Medios Ciencias de la Información |
Otros descriptores : | Current research information systems Institutional repositories Open access Open science Research information management |
Resumen : | This paper analyzes the factors that contribute or hinder the (joint) adoption of current research information systems (CRIS) and Open Access repositories (OAR) as manifestations of the Open Science principle. Given the significance attached to Open Open Access repositories (OAR) as manifestations of the Open Science principle. Given the significance attached to Open Science principles such as transparency and accessibility, we ask whether CRIS are able to reflect these priorities by providing Science principles such as transparency and accessibility, we ask whether CRIS are able to reflect these priorities by providing technical interfaces or integrating OAR into the CRIS structure. We suggest that the interplay of national and institutional technical interfaces or integrating OAR into the CRIS structure. We suggest that the interplay of national and institutional governance structures and policies is crucial for the adequate and efficient integration of CRIS and Open Science. To account for governance structures and policies is crucial for the adequate and efficient integration of CRIS and Open Science. To account for variances in both national and institutional context factors, we compare research institutions in three countries: Italy, the variances in both national and institutional context factors, we compare research institutions in three countries: Italy, the Netherlands and Germany. The qualitative exploratory analysis suggests that the consistent adoption and implementation of Netherlands and Germany. The qualitative exploratory analysis suggests that the consistent adoption and implementation of CRIS and Open Access policies in a science system are facilitated by national evaluation or quality assessment policies. In CRIS and Open Access policies in a science system are facilitated by national evaluation or quality assessment policies. In addition, the integration of Open Access repositories into CRIS is furthered by an institutionalized, efficient and flexible CRIS addition, the integration of Open Access repositories into CRIS is furthered by an institutionalized, efficient and flexible CRIS infrastructure. |
URI / Handle: | https://dspace-ti.anii.org.uy/jspui/handle/123456789/333 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.089 |
Identificador ANII: | FCE_1_2017_1_135352 |
Financiadores: | Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación |
Nivel de Acceso: | Acceso abierto |
Licencia CC: | Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY-NC-ND) |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable |
Archivos en este ítem:
archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1_s20_S1877050919300948_main.pdf | Descargar | 720.47 kB | Adobe PDF |
Las obras en REDI están protegidas por licencias Creative Commons.
Por más información sobre los términos de esta publicación, visita:
Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY-NC-ND)